William L. Pfeifer, Jr.

Alabama Appellate Lawyer with a Statewide Appellate Law Practice

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About Bill Pfeifer
  • Contact
  • Appeals
    • Criminal Appeals
    • Civil Appeals
    • Divorce Appeals
    • Personal Injury
  • Referrals
  • Legal Forms
  • Law Links
  • FAQS
You are here: Home » Blog » Appeals » Improper Closing Arguments – Part 2 – Personal Opinions and Beliefs

Improper Closing Arguments – Part 2 – Personal Opinions and Beliefs

May 3, 2012 by William L. Pfeifer, Jr.

In the second installment of our series on improper closing arguments in Alabama trials, we look at the problem of arguing personal opinions and beliefs. While attorneys are certainly free to talk about the evidence and draw logical inferences and conclusions from it, it is improper for a lawyer to express his or her personal beliefs and opinions. This issue most commonly arises in the context of prosecutors expressing their personal opinion to the jury that a defendant is guilty.

As the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals commented in Quinlivan v. State, 579 So. 2d 1386, 1387 (Ala. Crim. App. 1991), “Over a half century ago, the United States Supreme Court put special restraints on a prosecutor during closing arguments because of his unique role in the criminal justice system.” In Quinlivan, the conviction of the defendant/appellant was reversed by the Court of Criminal Appeals because of the prosecutor arguing his personal belief in the defendant’s guilt. The Court stated that “we are of the opinion that the prosecutor’s argument was nothing more than a blatant statement of his personal belief in the appellant’s guilt.”

The Alabama Supreme Court also addressed this issue in Adams v. State, 198 So. 2d 255 (Ala. 1967), holding that it is never proper for the prosecuting attorney to argue to the jury his personal belief in the belief in the guilt of the accused, as it makes the lawyer’s own character and credibility a consideration to the jury. The character and credibility of the lawyers is not part of the judicial proceeding, and efforts by the prosecutor to offer personal opinions violates his or her duties under the American Bar Association Canons of Professional Ethics. In essence, it allows the attorney to testify to facts not in evidence without being sworn in as a witness or being subject to cross-examination.

As discussed in our article on Improper Closing Arguments – Part 1 – Facts Not in Evidence, this issue must be raised to the trial court by the trial lawyer by means of an objection in order for this issue to be argued on appeal. If the trial lawyer does not make an objection to the improper closing argument, then the appellate courts will not consider the issue. The sole exception to this rule is in the context of death penalty cases, where the Court of Criminal Appeals and the Alabama Supreme Court will review the issue under the “plain error” standard. This probably explains why most of the published opinions discussing this issue are capital murder cases, as so few trial lawyers ever make objections to the closing arguments of their opponents.

Did you get convicted in a trial where the prosecutor argued his personal opinion that you were guilty? If your lawyer objected to it at trial, then you may have a good basis for having your conviction reversed on appeal. Contact our office to find out about your right to appeal and to discuss whether you have grounds for reversing a conviction or verdict over improper closing arguments. Also, if your attorney failed to make an objection, it may still be possible for you to raise the issue through a Rule 32 petition. You can find several articles about Rule 32 petitions in our blog, or you can contact our office to discuss the specifics of your case.

Alabama State Bar rules require the following disclaimer in all attorney advertisements: “No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of services provided by other attorneys.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Filed Under: Appeals Tagged With: Alabama, Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure, Alabama Supreme Court, Appeal, Closing argument, Lawyer, Prosecutor, Rule 32, United States Supreme Court

Search

Recent Posts

  • Can you impeach your own witness in Alabama? Rule 607 provides the answer.
  • Hurricane Irma Courthouse Closures
  • Drug Forfeiture Appeals – Car forfeiture reversed based on innocent owner defense
  • Alabama Forfeiture Statute – Ala. Code Section 20-2-92 Drug Crime Forfeitures
  • Motion for Mistrial for undisclosed evidence in Alabama felony cases must be timely made
  • Alabama prison rape, violence, overcrowding, and abuse investigated by Department of Justice (DOJ)
  • Motion to continue trial due to an absent or unavailable witness – appealing the denial of a continuance in Alabama criminal court cases (video)
  • Alabama appellate lawyer video – new video on Alabama appeals added to YouTube
  • Alabama ‘McLendon standard’ in child custody modification appeals
  • AAJ Paralegal of the Year Award – Nominations Now Open

Avvo

Lawyer William Pfeifer | Top Attorney Appeals

Alabama Appellate Lawyer on Facebook

Alabama Appellate Lawyer

Archives

Categories

  • About.com
  • Appeals
  • Books
  • Business
  • Civil Procedure
  • Crime
  • Criminal Law
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Drug Crimes
  • Evidence
  • Family Law
  • Forfeiture
  • Immigration
  • Juveniles
  • Law Practice Management
  • Lawyer Referral Services
  • Legal Forms
  • Legal News
  • Legal Research
  • Legal Resources
  • Motions
  • Office Updates
  • Sex Crimes
  • Statutes
  • Technology
  • Video
  • Website

AVVO

Lawyer William Pfeifer | Top Attorney Appeals

Follow Us On Facebook

Alabama Appellate Lawyer

Tags

Alabama Alabama courthouse Alabama courthouse photos Alabama Court of Civil Appeals Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Alabama forfeiture Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure Alabama State Bar Alabama Supreme Court Appeal Appeals and Writs Appellate court Boglin Closing argument conviction Criminal Law Criminal Procedure divorce drug forfeiture effective assistance of counsel Examiner.com felony conviction Florida guilty plea ineffective assistance of counsel law Lawyer Lawyers and Law Firms legal forms legal research legal resources legal writing Plea post-conviction Practice of law Rule 32 Services Strickland Strickland v Washington Supreme Court Trial court United States United States Supreme Court updates Website

Pages

  • *WP Mobile Edition (Blog Index)
  • *WP Mobile Edition (Contact)
  • About Bill Pfeifer
  • Alabama Appellate Attorney
  • Alabama Appellate Lawyer
  • Alabama Civil Appeals Lawyer
  • Alabama Civil Litigation
  • Alabama Divorce Appeal Lawyer
  • Alabama Legal Forms
  • Alabama Personal Injury Lawyer – Litigation and Appeals
  • Appeals
  • Appellate Criminal Defense
  • Areas of Practice
  • Articles Elsewhere
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Contact
  • Family Law
  • FAQS – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Law Links Directory
  • Legal Forms
  • Newsletter
  • Office Locations
  • Payment
  • Privacy Policy
  • Referrals from Lawyers

Copyright © 2021 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in