William L. Pfeifer, Jr.

Alabama Appellate Lawyer with a Statewide Appellate Law Practice

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About Bill Pfeifer
  • Contact
  • Appeals
    • Criminal Appeals
    • Civil Appeals
    • Divorce Appeals
    • Personal Injury
  • Referrals
  • Legal Forms
  • Law Links
  • FAQS
You are here: Home » Law Links Directory » Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure » ARCP Rule 41: Dismissal of actions

ARCP Rule 41: Dismissal of actions

Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure

VI. TRIALS

Rule 41. Dismissal of actions

(a) Voluntary dismissal: Effect thereof.

(1) BY PLAINTIFF; BY STIPULATION. Subject to the provisions of Rule 23(e), of Rule 66, and of any statute of this state, an action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of court (i) by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or of a motion for summary judgment, whichever first occurs, or (ii) by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared in the action. Unless otherwise stated in the notice of dismissal or stipulation, the dismissal is without prejudice, except that a notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication upon the merits when filed by a plaintiff who has once dismissed in any court of Alabama, or of the United States, or of any state, an action based on or including the same claim.

(2) BY ORDER OF COURT. Except as provided in paragraph (1) of this subdivision of this rule, an action shall not be dismissed at the plaintiff’s instance save upon order of the court and upon such terms and conditions as the court deems proper. If a counterclaim has been pleaded by a defendant prior to the service upon the defendant of the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss, the action may be dismissed but the counterclaim shall remain pending for adjudication by the court. Unless otherwise specified in the order, a dismissal under this paragraph is without prejudice.

(b) Involuntary dismissal: Effect thereof. For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or of any claim against the defendant. Unless the court in its order for dismissal otherwise specifies, a dismissal under this subdivision and any dismissal not provided for in this rule, other than a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, for improper venue, or for failure to join a party under Rule 19, operates as an adjudication upon the merits.

(c) Dismissal of counterclaim, cross-claim or third-party claim. The provisions of this rule apply to the dismissal of any counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim. A voluntary dismissal by the claimant alone pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of this rule shall be made before a responsive pleading is served or, if there is none, before the introduction of evidence at the trial or hearing.

(d) Costs of previously dismissed action. If a plaintiff who has once dismissed an action in any court commences an action based upon or including the same claim against the same defendant, the court may make such order for the payment of costs of the action previously dismissed as it may deem proper and may stay the proceedings in the action until the plaintiff has complied with the order.

(dc) District court rule. Rule 41 applies in the district courts, except that the references to Rule 23(e) and Rule 66 at Rule 41(a)(1) are deleted.

[Amended 5-16-83, eff. 7-1-83; Amended eff. 10-1-95.]

Committee Comments on 1973 Adoption

The rule is substantially the same as the corresponding federal rule. The second sentence of Rule 41(a)(2) has been altered to state unequivocally that a counterclaim interposed prior to dismissal of the action remains pending despite the dismissal. See also Rule 13(i). The similar portion of the federal rule is cryptically worded and at best states an exception which is needless in a state court of general jurisdiction, however necessary it may be in the federal courts where jurisdiction is limited.

The purpose of Rule 41(a) is to facilitate voluntary dismissals but to limit them to an early stage of the proceedings before issue is joined. Harvey Aluminum Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co., 203 F.2d 105 (2d Cir.1953), cert. denied 345 U.S. 964, 73 S.Ct. 949, 97 L.Ed. 1383. Once issue has been joined, by answer or by motion for summary judgment, voluntary dismissal can only be upon court order, and the court is given broad powers to prevent harassment of or inconvenience to the defendant by an arbitrary dismissal at this advanced stage of the case.

Rule 41(b), F.R.C.P., as originally promulgated, applied to both jury and non-jury cases. By amendment, its function is clearly limited to non-jury cases. In a jury case, Rule 50 applies and the court is limited to a question of law (thereby preserving jury trial right) as to the sufficiency of plaintiff’s prima facie case. In a non-jury case, the court, under Rule 41(b), as ultimate trier of fact, is free to weigh the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses. See O’Brien v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 293 F.2d 1 (3d Cir.1961) for a discussion of the confusion arising from the overlap that once existed. See, generally, 5 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 41.13[3], at p. 1153 (2d Ed.1971). No present Alabama procedure permits such action in a non-jury trial.

A dismissal, whether voluntary or involuntary, may be set aside by the court, like any other judgment, on proper motion under Rule 60(b). A rehearing may be requested under Rule 59(a)(2) and amendments to the court’s findings
may be pursued under Rule 52(b).

Committee Comments to October 1, 1995, Amendment to Rule 41

Subdivision (b). This amendment deletes the provision for dismissal by the court in a nonjury case for failure of proof. This matter is now covered by Rule 52(c).

District Court Committee Comments (Amended effective July 1, 1983.)

For commentary as to the unavailability of Rule 23 (“Class Actions”) and Rule 66 (“Receivers”), see the District Court Committee Comments applicable to those rules.

[Amended effective July 1, 1983.]

Search

Recent Posts

  • Can you impeach your own witness in Alabama? Rule 607 provides the answer.
  • Hurricane Irma Courthouse Closures
  • Drug Forfeiture Appeals – Car forfeiture reversed based on innocent owner defense
  • Alabama Forfeiture Statute – Ala. Code Section 20-2-92 Drug Crime Forfeitures
  • Motion for Mistrial for undisclosed evidence in Alabama felony cases must be timely made
  • Alabama prison rape, violence, overcrowding, and abuse investigated by Department of Justice (DOJ)
  • Motion to continue trial due to an absent or unavailable witness – appealing the denial of a continuance in Alabama criminal court cases (video)
  • Alabama appellate lawyer video – new video on Alabama appeals added to YouTube
  • Alabama ‘McLendon standard’ in child custody modification appeals
  • AAJ Paralegal of the Year Award – Nominations Now Open

Avvo

Lawyer William Pfeifer | Top Attorney Appeals

Alabama Appellate Lawyer on Facebook

Alabama Appellate Lawyer

Archives

Categories

  • About.com
  • Appeals
  • Books
  • Business
  • Civil Procedure
  • Crime
  • Criminal Law
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Drug Crimes
  • Evidence
  • Family Law
  • Forfeiture
  • Immigration
  • Juveniles
  • Law Practice Management
  • Lawyer Referral Services
  • Legal Forms
  • Legal News
  • Legal Research
  • Legal Resources
  • Motions
  • Office Updates
  • Sex Crimes
  • Statutes
  • Technology
  • Video
  • Website

AVVO

Lawyer William Pfeifer | Top Attorney Appeals

Follow Us On Facebook

Alabama Appellate Lawyer

Tags

Alabama Alabama courthouse Alabama courthouse photos Alabama Court of Civil Appeals Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Alabama forfeiture Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure Alabama State Bar Alabama Supreme Court Appeal Appeals and Writs Appellate court Boglin Closing argument conviction Criminal Law Criminal Procedure divorce drug forfeiture effective assistance of counsel Examiner.com felony conviction Florida guilty plea ineffective assistance of counsel law Lawyer Lawyers and Law Firms legal forms legal research legal resources legal writing Plea post-conviction Practice of law Rule 32 Services Strickland Strickland v Washington Supreme Court Trial court United States United States Supreme Court updates Website

Pages

  • *WP Mobile Edition (Blog Index)
  • *WP Mobile Edition (Contact)
  • About Bill Pfeifer
  • Alabama Appellate Attorney
  • Alabama Appellate Lawyer
  • Alabama Civil Appeals Lawyer
  • Alabama Civil Litigation
  • Alabama Divorce Appeal Lawyer
  • Alabama Legal Forms
  • Alabama Personal Injury Lawyer – Litigation and Appeals
  • Appeals
  • Appellate Criminal Defense
  • Areas of Practice
  • Articles Elsewhere
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Contact
  • Family Law
  • FAQS – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Law Links Directory
  • Legal Forms
  • Newsletter
  • Office Locations
  • Payment
  • Privacy Policy
  • Referrals from Lawyers

Copyright © 2021 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in